Identity
Filter
Visitors
(0) (0) (0) (0) (1) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (61) (0) (0) (0)Subscribers
(0) (0)
Highest posts
- 11/07 11:15 +1 Re: Comment to Eric from topic "What can 4 of us actually do?"
- 10/07 11:33 +1 Re: Comment to Eric from topic "What can 4 of us actually do?"
- 29/06 18:33 +1 Re: Comment to Eric from topic "What can 4 of us actually do?"
Latest posts
- 11/07 11:15 +1 Re: Comment to Eric from topic "What can 4 of us actually do?"
- 10/07 11:33 +1 Re: Comment to Eric from topic "What can 4 of us actually do?"
- 29/06 18:33 +1 Re: Comment to Eric from topic "What can 4 of us actually do?"
Links
Blogs
Democracy
Search
[top-politics] Comment to Eric from topic "What can 4 of us actually do?"
-
Okay, let us hold back the voting on the topics since you have some more things to say. Best Regards Eric Lim
illegale <geoerdeaen@yahoo.com> wrote: lpc1998 wrote:
> +1 > > [Eric]: > Okay, so we have three topics for discussion: > > 1 What does democracy mean to you?; > 2 What does TOP mean to you?; or > 3 What are the pros and cons of the delegated vote? > > I vote for Topic 2. As there are a total of 4 votes, the first topic that gets 3 or more votes shall be the topic selected for discussion. If none gets voted, then we shall have Round 2 of voting and vote on the first 2 topics that get the highest number of votes. If there are 2 topics with the same number of votes at the 2nd place, then Gale shall have the casting vote.
Hello Eric.
I have to give an objection up there. You are starting second turn a little bit before the rest of group actually made clear thought about what is up to us actually to do at all.
So please, lets set first thing first and than go forward.
ATB;
Gale> [echarp]: > “The voting process could be continuous. That means that any body > accepted in the electoral list will have his votes counted, but also > that any vote can be changed any time.” > > [Eric]: > The continuous vote may not be appropriate for the voting of topics for discussion unless we want to change the discussion topic half-way when it loses the majority support. > > The pros and cons of the continuous vote for the election of a public officer could be another topic for discussion at some other time. > > [echarp]: > “What do you think of the -1/0/+1 process to show if you accept or > reject something?” > > [Eric]: > What do I do when there are two major points in a message where I agree with one and not the other? > > Best Regards > Eric Lim > >
+1
-
Thank you Eric for your kindness.
ATB,
Gale
+1
-
I vote for no. 2.
(Happily noting that we are run direct democratically from now..:-)
+1
-
MG wrote:
> I vote for no. 2. > (Happily noting that we are run direct democratically from now..:-)
Your cast is noiced :-)
ATB,
Gale
+1
-
-
-
