http://leparlement.org/Re_Dynamicly_Distributed_Democracy_1/index.rss [top-politics] Re: Dynamicly Distributed Democracy 2006-06-16 23:24:23+0200 http://leparlement.org/Re_SD2-Smartocracy_Never_pure_DD_1/index.rss http://leparlement.org/Re_SD2-Smartocracy_Never_pure_DD_1/index.rss Mark <p><p>&gt;M: This also is ethical because:</p> <p>&gt;M: 1.The voter isn&#8217;t forced into RD, because (s)he gets representitives anyway, regardless of the system.</p> <p>&gt;mG: Talk about selfcontradiciton in one sentence!</p> <p>-M: No, I already mentioned how even in a DD, the top administrators are representitives.</p> <p><a class="readMore" href="#" onclick="Element.hide(this); Element.removeClassName(this.parentNode.nextSibling, 'tooLarge'); return false;">Read more&#8230; / Lire plus&#8230;</a> <div class="tooLarge"></p> <p>&gt;mG: And it is unethical to not being able to decide things yourself&#8230;</p> <p>-M: Doink! This is still deciding yourself because it is democracy.(I have said this many times before.)</p> <p>&gt;mG:&#8230;if you know that you are able and you are part of the group/community/nation.</p> <p>-M: Yes, one should decide, thats why one should have inputs into the system.</p> <p>shanti<br/> Mark, Seattle WA <span class="caps">USA</span></p> </div></p> 2006-06-16 13:10:23+0200 http://leparlement.org/Re_SD2-Smartocracy_Never_pure_DD/index.rss http://leparlement.org/Re_SD2-Smartocracy_Never_pure_DD/index.rss Magnus <p><p>&gt;This also is ethical because: 1.The voter isn&#8217;t forced into RD, because (s)he gets representitives anyway, regardless of the system.</p> <p>-Talk about selfcontradiciton in one sentence!</p> <p>-And it is unethical to not being able to decide things yourself if you know that you are able and you are part of the group/community/nation.</p></p> 2006-06-14 23:49:03+0200 http://leparlement.org/SD2-Smartocracy_Never_pure_DD/index.rss http://leparlement.org/SD2-Smartocracy_Never_pure_DD/index.rss Mark <p><p>MG wrote:<br/></p> <p>&gt; &gt;-M: &#8216;all or some&#8217; &#8211; Which one? And who would decide? I say have the possibility for delegation for <span class="caps">ALL</span> issues, with defaulting to general representitives.</p> <p>&gt;mG: -This is almost as described by AD. The voter decides how to use his power.</p> <p><a class="readMore" href="#" onclick="Element.hide(this); Element.removeClassName(this.parentNode.nextSibling, 'tooLarge'); return false;">Read more&#8230; / Lire plus&#8230;</a> <div class="tooLarge"></p> <p>-M: My SD2-Smartocracy plan is never pure DD.</p> <p>The voter can vote for an issue only, but the algorithm will use this voter&#8217;s voting power toward representitives.</p> <p>This is practical because it can yield PageRankable data, despite having only <strong>local</strong> DD data.(Quality filtering.)</p> <p>This also is ethical because:<br/> 1.The voter isn&#8217;t forced into RD, because (s)he gets representitives anyway, regardless of the system.</p> <ol> <li>The voter is informed that his/her voting power is not going to the top ranked, and is just going to fill gaps in the rank distribution curve.</li> </ol> <p>shanti<br/> Mark, Seattle WA <span class="caps">USA</span></p> </div></p> 2006-06-14 13:15:00+0200 http://leparlement.org/Re_Dynamicly_Distributed_Democracy_2/index.rss http://leparlement.org/Re_Dynamicly_Distributed_Democracy_2/index.rss Magnus <p><p>&gt;-M: &#8216;all or some&#8217; &#8211; Which one? And who would decide?</p> <p>I say have the possibility for delegation for <span class="caps">ALL</span> issues, with defaulting to general representitives.</p> <p>-This is almost as described by AD. The voter decides how to use his power.</p></p>