Identity
Filter
Visitors
(0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (1) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (61) (0) (0) (0)Subscribers
(0) (0)
Highest posts
- 16/06 23:24 +1 Re: SD2-Smartocracy. Never pure DD.
- 16/06 13:10 +1 Re: SD2-Smartocracy. Never pure DD.
- 14/06 23:49 +1 SD2-Smartocracy. Never pure DD.
Latest posts
- 16/06 23:24 +1 Re: SD2-Smartocracy. Never pure DD.
- 16/06 13:10 +1 Re: SD2-Smartocracy. Never pure DD.
- 14/06 23:49 +1 SD2-Smartocracy. Never pure DD.
Links
Blogs
Democracy
Search
[top-politics] Re: Dynamicly Distributed Democracy
-
>-M: ‘all or some’ – Which one? And who would decide?
I say have the possibility for delegation for ALL issues, with defaulting to general representitives.
-This is almost as described by AD. The voter decides how to use his power.
+1
-
14/06/06 23:49
SD2-Smartocracy. Never pure DD.
MG wrote:
> >-M: ‘all or some’ – Which one? And who would decide? I say have the possibility for delegation for ALL issues, with defaulting to general representitives.
>mG: -This is almost as described by AD. The voter decides how to use his power.
-M: My SD2-Smartocracy plan is never pure DD.
The voter can vote for an issue only, but the algorithm will use this voter’s voting power toward representitives.
This is practical because it can yield PageRankable data, despite having only local DD data.(Quality filtering.)
This also is ethical because:
1.The voter isn’t forced into RD, because (s)he gets representitives anyway, regardless of the system.- The voter is informed that his/her voting power is not going to the top ranked, and is just going to fill gaps in the rank distribution curve.
shanti
Mark, Seattle WA USA
+1
-
>This also is ethical because: 1.The voter isn’t forced into RD, because (s)he gets representitives anyway, regardless of the system.
-Talk about selfcontradiciton in one sentence!
-And it is unethical to not being able to decide things yourself if you know that you are able and you are part of the group/community/nation.
+1
-
>M: This also is ethical because:
>M: 1.The voter isn’t forced into RD, because (s)he gets representitives anyway, regardless of the system.
>mG: Talk about selfcontradiciton in one sentence!
-M: No, I already mentioned how even in a DD, the top administrators are representitives.
>mG: And it is unethical to not being able to decide things yourself…
-M: Doink! This is still deciding yourself because it is democracy.(I have said this many times before.)
>mG:…if you know that you are able and you are part of the group/community/nation.
-M: Yes, one should decide, thats why one should have inputs into the system.
shanti
Mark, Seattle WA USA
+1
-
-
14/06/06 23:49
