Re: FAQ? and setup

echarp — 2007-03-21 14:15:23+0100

On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:17:53AM +0100, eggy wrote:

> I joined second life, than un-joined. I do not like my credit card out there in > such a place. There are many who feel they have been ripped off by second life. > > Is there an alternative? Can we continue without second life?

We definitely can. Me, I’m sticking with irc mainly. But klaus, cool guy that he is, has been working on a second life to irc bridge.

Read more… / Lire plus…

We’ll see how it goes, but it’s a great idea!

> I did go to the Top Politics board. I can access it on site too. I do not like > the direction of these topics. It seems the implementation of these “ideas” and > the administration of government are completely absent. > > It certainly is not necessary for Parliament to join Top Politics. A simple > link for those who want to subscribe is sufficient. An occasional (abbreviated) > post of a discussion may be appropriate if the poster has a comment on that > post.

There also is parlement moderation, which could/should be used to highlight the most interesting parts. Well, that’s the idea anyway.

Then anybody could browse the forum, with the level of details they feel more confortable with.

> Also, there is no consideration of the obvious destruction of democracy by > majority vote. This is a Truth learned from past historical attempts.

I think there is mostly one solution: the right to secede. But it’s difficult to even present it…

Re: FAQ? and setup

eggy — 2007-03-05 08:42:28+0100

Used my mIRC and found # Parlement.
Yikes nobody on IRC -- been few years since I logged on. Most use messengers now I expect or other ways.
Would have to schedule a meeting to use I expect. eggy

Re: FAQ? and setup

eggy — 2007-03-05 01:17:53+0100

I joined second life, than un-joined. I do not like my credit card out there in such a place. There are many who feel they have been ripped off by second life.

Is there an alternative? Can we continue without second life?

I did go to the Top Politics board. I can access it on site too. I do not like the direction of these topics. It seems the implementation of these “ideas” and the administration of government are completely absent.

It certainly is not necessary for Parliament to join Top Politics. A simple link for those who want to subscribe is sufficient. An occasional (abbreviated) post of a discussion may be appropriate if the poster has a comment on that post.

Read more… / Lire plus…

Also, there is no consideration of the obvious destruction of democracy by majority vote. This is a Truth learned from past historical attempts.

There MUST be POWER! But it must be controlled first by a Constitution which applies to the people as well as the government.

Power must be divided so one element does not have it all. Law is power, Courts are power, Agencies are power (needed to have retirement and health and education etc.)

A bit of history will reveal all so no sense my explaining this.

Bruce Eggum

Re: FAQ? and setup

eggy — 2007-03-21 14:39:07+0100

Yup, I’ll show them! I will secede! (Just call me “the man without a country”)
Unfortunately, the imperialists win that way too.

On 3/21/07, echarp <emmanuel.charpentier@free.fr> wrote:

> > +1 > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:17:53AM +0100, eggy wrote: > > I joined second life, than un-joined. I do not like my credit card out > there in > > such a place. There are many who feel they have been ripped off by > second life. > > > > Is there an alternative? Can we continue without second life? > > We definitely can. Me, I’m sticking with irc mainly. But klaus, cool guy > that he is, has been working on a second life to irc bridge. > > We’ll see how it goes, but it’s a great idea! > > > I did go to the Top Politics board. I can access it on site too. I do > not like > > the direction of these topics. It seems the implementation of these > “ideas” and > > the administration of government are completely absent. > > > > It certainly is not necessary for Parliament to join Top Politics. A > simple > > link for those who want to subscribe is sufficient. An occasional > (abbreviated) > > post of a discussion may be appropriate if the poster has a comment on > that > > post. > > There also is parlement moderation, which could/should be used to > highlight the most interesting parts. Well, that’s the idea anyway. > > Then anybody could browse the forum, with the level of details they > feel more confortable with. > > > Also, there is no consideration of the obvious destruction of democracy > by > > majority vote. This is a Truth learned from past historical attempts. > > I think there is mostly one solution: the right to secede. But it’s > difficult to even present it… > >

Read more… / Lire plus…

— Bruce Eggum
Gresham Wisconsin, USA
Urge to Surge
http://tinyurl.com/yndynn
http://www.doinggovernment.com/
Check out my Blog too
http://bruceeggum.blogster.com/

vote

Re: FAQ? and setup

echarp — 2007-03-21 14:12:12+0100

+1 Welcome on the old irc world! ;)

Re: FAQ? and setup

echarp — 2007-03-04 12:46:18+0100

> I now see Mac Hiavelli msg and suppose I am responding to it. How do I respond > directly to the FAQ?

I think the main message was in private or something. I don’t have it either. It might be lost!? Will have to dig into that.

On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 12:20:59PM +0100, eggy wrote:

> Re: FAQ? and setup > > I am confused as to how to view the messages. I kept clicking, and the message > came and went but repeating the process did not work.

Read more… / Lire plus…

The most important thing to consider, is the filter. But you can override a filter for each element, clicking on the “V” or “>” knobs.

> When I click a name, it takes me to choices of message title. I cannot access > them. Are they simply votes?

You can’t access them? Strange, a click should be all that is needed.

Re: FAQ? and setup

theprezens — 2007-07-01 00:38:24+0200