[top-politics] Re: Parlement Version 0.9

Mark Rosst — 2006-11-25 21:43:22+0100

ec: -1 You consider “people” lemmings and the enemy of democracy, yet democracy is “rule by the people”, hence, you are not really a democrat.

-M: No, only most of the people are lemmings. SD2-S allows the lemmings to select non-lemmings.

ec: +1 of course. How many points until he reconsiders his positions? M: What points? I keep whupping you as evidenced by your dodging.

Read more… / Lire plus…

ec: You are a disagreeable person,...

~~M: I am very lovable. :~~) I think that you would like me in person.

ec: ...so excuse me for not enjoying your company.

-M: You did dodge again. Are you being the best Emmanuel that you can be?

How many points until he does not consider himself as the master of this forum?

M: I am the master because I am the one who promotes the most truth.

ec: See what I mean by “disagreeable”? Mark, you are not a person I appreciate, and I do not consider you of interest.

-M: My techniques are powerful. Don’t you find power to be interesting?
See, I am a mind control expert.

shanti
Mark, Seattle WA USA

--—-—_----—-—-—---—~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “top-politics” group. To post to this group, send email to top-politics@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to top-politics-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/top-politics?hl=en _--—---------——_—--~-

[top-politics] Re: Parlement Version 0.9

echarp — 2006-11-25 11:42:54+0100

-1

You consider “people” lemmings and the enemy of democracy, yet democracy is “rule by the people”, hence, you are not really a democrat.

+1 of course. How many points until he reconsiders his positions?

What points? I keep whupping you as evidenced by your dodging.

You are a disagreeable person, so excuse me for not enjoying your company.

Read more… / Lire plus…

How many points until he does not consider himself as the master of this forum?

I am the master because I am the one who promotes the most truth.

See what I mean by “disagreeable”? Mark, you are not a person I appreciate, and I do not consider you of interest.

echarp – http://leparlement.org

[top-politics] Re: Parlement Version 0.9

Mark Rosst — 2006-11-25 03:56:43+0100

ec: +1 of course. How many points until he reconsiders his positions?

-M: What points? I keep whupping you as evidenced by your dodging.

Read more… / Lire plus…

ec: How many points until he does not consider himself as the master of this forum?

-M: I am the master because I am the one who promotes the most truth.

shanti
Mark, Seattle WA USA

[top-politics] Re: Parlement Version 0.9

Mark Rosst — 2006-11-25 01:04:23+0100

G: +1 Its been a while since last time I read Marks posts. To many ad hominems,...

-M: Where?

G:...proving inconsistency for a sake of inconsistency, ...

Read more… / Lire plus…

-M: Where?

G: no goal orientation. Too bad. ATB, Gale

-M: I’ll get there. Right now I am just responding to people.

shanti
Mark, Seattle WA USA

[top-politics] Re: Parlement Version 0.9

Mark Rosst — 2006-11-25 01:01:39+0100

S: Mark, Your post contains no practical suggestion or constructive part.

-M: Agreed.

S: Failing that, I don’t see a point in discussing any further.

Read more… / Lire plus…

-M: You have practical suggestions?

S: It’s really a shame because your very presence on the group shows you have a similar concern to ours in bringing more participation to the political process. Serge

-M: WTF are you doing?

shanti
Mark, Seattle WA USA

[top-politics] Re: Parlement Version 0.9

echarp — 2006-11-24 18:01:48+0100

+1 of course.

How many points until he reconsiders his positions?

How many points until he does not consider himself as the master of this forum?

echarp – http://leparlement.org

[top-politics] Re: Parlement Version 0.9

Gordan Ponjavic — 2006-11-24 12:44:08+0100

Its been a while since last time I read Marks posts. To many ad hominems, proving inconsistency for a sake of inconsistency, no goal orientation.

Too bad.

ATB,
Gale

Read more… / Lire plus…

[top-politics] Re: Parlement Version 0.9

Serge — 2006-11-23 23:11:18+0100

Mark,
Your post contains no practical suggestion or constructive part. Failing that, I don’t see a point in discussing any further. It’s really a shame because your very presence on the group shows you have a similar concern to ours in bringing more participation to the political process.
Serge