Identity
Filter
Visitors
(0) (1) (0) (0) (1) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (61) (0) (0) (0)Subscribers
(0) (0)
Highest posts
- 14/06 06:49 +1 Re: Screenshot
- 14/06 00:14 +1 Re: Screenshot
- 13/06 20:19 +1 Re: Screenshot
- 13/06 20:06 +1 Re: Screenshot
Latest posts
- 14/06 06:49 +1 Re: Screenshot
- 14/06 00:14 +1 Re: Screenshot
- 13/06 20:19 +1 Re: Screenshot
- 13/06 20:06 +1 Re: Screenshot
Links
Blogs
Democracy
Search
[top-politics] Re: Screenshot
-
>G: Do we need it right now? If not, when we gonna need it? ATB; Gale
-M: Smartocracy seems like the best current operational model, which can be improved with SD2 and TOP.
So I am not proposing it for TOP specificly.
I am proposing it as an improvement for Smartocracy.shanti
Mark, Seattle WA USA
+1
-
Do you see anybody interested in Smartocracy around?
It seems to me group has died. Probably no interest in group projects.
So, what might be interest, if not group projects, are comments of exact things, as long as there is more then plenty of non checked models that are not too interesting for discussions any more. People got tired of them, if I may notice.
ATB;
Gale
+1
-
illegale wrote: >G: Do you see anybody interested in Smartocracy around?
-M: You? I would like to give Karl and Markus time to comment.
>G: It seems to me group has died. Probably no interest in group projects. So, what might be interest, if not group projects, are comments of exact things, as long as there is more then plenty of non checked models that are not too interesting for discussions any more. People got tired of them, if I may notice. ATB; Gale
-M: Smartocracy is the most promising thing that I have seen, and I want to give it a chance.(If few/no one here is interested, this is then revealing about the group.)
And it is advanced enough where few modifications by an INDIVIDUAL could yield a distinct program.
And I just e-mailed them and told them that I want access to their site and software.
Hopefully they will be responsive.shanti
Mark, Seattle WA USA
+1
-
There are two things I like to seperate. Visions and strategies.
We as a group as I can notice do not have big problems with visions, that are actual motivators for an action and directions, but with strategies.
I do not see how Smartocracy can become important in this part , so as long as I miss this part, I have to say I am not interested into one of actual dozens of informatical models based on network measiring.
Of course, as long as I miss some stuff as everybody does, if you find something promising about strategy part, please give us some notice.
ATB,
Gale
+1
-
illegale wrote:
> There are two things I like to seperate. Visions and strategies. > We as a group as I can notice do not have big problems with visions, > that are actual motivators for an action and directions, but with > strategies. I do not see how Smartocracy can become important in this part , so as > long as I miss this part, I have to say I am not interested into one of > actual dozens of informatical models based on network measiring. > Of course, as long as I miss some stuff as everybody does, if you find > something promising about strategy part, please give us some notice. > ATB, Gale
-M: How about this?:
A political party organized with SD2-Smartocracy.
People would choose those they trust the most as general trustees, and they would choose the most competent people for specific issues.
It could be global scale or it could be for a village, or any scale inbetween.
And since its built with Ruby on Rails, it is on the most versitile and user friendly OpenSource platform that I am aware of.shanti
Mark, Seattle WA USA
+1
-
-
-
-
