Identity
Filter
Visitors
(0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (16) (0) (0) (61) (0) (0) (0)Subscribers
(0) (0)
Highest posts
Latest posts
Links
Blogs
Democracy
Search
[top-politics] Re: Secret votes
-
A while ago we in Tiaktiv thought that we might be authorizing body that would give licenses.
Yet, if you create such body that is giving licenses, than there is a big concentration of power in one place, which is not good. Now we believe that we work in the same manner as GNU is working. They just develop policies and if you like them, you adopt them.
If you are taking policies that you do not obey to, than every individual has to clearly notice such thing, which gives such organization bad reputation of fakers.
About your comment, the problem is that such principle can kidnap meaning of TOP. Imagine thing where four of us are TOP and in next time somebody threaten us so we have to go non-TOP and adopt policies that are against it. It would ruin the power of such brand which is not a good thing I believe.
That is the reason why I believe that every single individual should be the one to judge who is top and who is not.
I hope it makes sense.
ATB,
Gale--—-—----—-—-—---—~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “top-politics” group. To post to this group, send email to top-politics@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to top-politics-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/top-politics?hl=en--—---------———--~-
+1
