<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>[top-politics] Re: Software initiatives</title>
    <link>http://leparlement.org/Re_Software_initiatives_78/vote.rss</link>
    <description>[top-politics] Re: Software initiatives</description>
    <item>
      <title>[top-politics] Re: Software initiatives</title>
      <vote>1</vote>
      <pubDate>2006-10-24 10:29:42+0200</pubDate>
      <link>http://leparlement.org/Re_Software_initiatives_84/vote.rss</link>
      <comments>http://leparlement.org/Re_Software_initiatives_84/vote.rss</comments>
      <dc:creator>echarp</dc:creator>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; You could use a selected board for that if you want to :)
&amp;gt; 
&amp;gt; See?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course you &lt;em&gt;could&lt;/em&gt;, but it is bad engineering.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt; Or try to come to a consensus.
&amp;gt; &amp;gt;
&amp;gt; &amp;gt; As already happens in all voting offices.
&amp;gt; 
&amp;gt; Is it? And what even if so, if we call a discussion of a badly written
&amp;gt; or torn ballot a &amp;#8220;software problem&amp;#8221;, isn&amp;#8217;t the people in that voting
&amp;gt; office a trusted board?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They are not a trusted board.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a class="readMore" href="#" onclick="Element.hide(this); Element.removeClassName(this.parentNode.nextSibling, 'tooLarge'); return false;"&gt;Read more&amp;#8230; / Lire plus&amp;#8230;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="tooLarge"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They are all willing people and parties. They reach a consensus.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;echarp &amp;#8211; &lt;a href="http://leparlement.org"&gt;http://leparlement.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
