<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>[top-politics] Re: Software initiatives</title>
    <link>http://leparlement.org/Re_Software_initiatives_82/vote.rss</link>
    <description>[top-politics] Re: Software initiatives</description>
    <item>
      <title>[top-politics] Re: Software initiatives</title>
      <vote>2</vote>
      <pubDate>2006-10-24 10:44:39+0200</pubDate>
      <link>http://leparlement.org/Re_Software_initiatives_83/vote.rss</link>
      <comments>http://leparlement.org/Re_Software_initiatives_83/vote.rss</comments>
      <dc:creator>echarp</dc:creator>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt; But, during the vote, any single point of failure ought to be
&amp;gt; &amp;gt; removed to strengthen the whole thing. Consensus is the tool of
&amp;gt; &amp;gt; choice to agree on what the expressed decisions are (as is currently
&amp;gt; &amp;gt; the case).
&amp;gt;
&amp;gt; Just like to add that what possibilities and rights a bord should have
&amp;gt; ofcourse have to very clearly specified and it shall only be more or
&amp;gt; less technical issues about the voting process in relation to the
&amp;gt; design intent, nothing more.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The voting system has to be defined for the voters to cast their vote.
Anybody willing should be able to follow that through and, with the
votes database, be able to come to the correct results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The voting procedure should be defined&amp;#8230; democratically! ;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; So his has to be written clearly in a regulation document, otherwise
&amp;gt; this board soon enough will contain old politicians seeing a way of
&amp;gt; preserving their own power instead of acting simple clerks, working
&amp;gt; more as servants to the voters.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a class="readMore" href="#" onclick="Element.hide(this); Element.removeClassName(this.parentNode.nextSibling, 'tooLarge'); return false;"&gt;Read more&amp;#8230; / Lire plus&amp;#8230;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="tooLarge"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Coming to a consensus is a matter of technicality. Otherwise it is open
to all sorts of other matters.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That consensus should become a widespread habit, where many will check
all results, and media would report their own. Then it&amp;#8217;s a matter of
reputation and outcomes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;echarp &amp;#8211; &lt;a href="http://leparlement.org/fr"&gt;http://leparlement.org/fr&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[top-politics] Re: Software initiatives</title>
      <vote>1</vote>
      <pubDate>2006-10-24 12:18:10+0200</pubDate>
      <link>http://leparlement.org/Re_Software_initiatives_85/vote.rss</link>
      <comments>http://leparlement.org/Re_Software_initiatives_85/vote.rss</comments>
      <dc:creator>Magnus</dc:creator>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;+1 &amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
