<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>[top-politics] Re: TOP oriented to individual, not organisation</title>
    <link>http://leparlement.org/Re_TOP_oriented_to_individual_not_organisation_10/index.rss</link>
    <description>[top-politics] Re: TOP oriented to individual, not organisation</description>
    <item>
      <title>[top-politics] Re: TOP oriented to individual, not organisation</title>
      <pubDate>2006-12-10 23:28:25+0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://leparlement.org/Re_TOP_oriented_to_individual_not_organisation_13/index.rss</link>
      <comments>http://leparlement.org/Re_TOP_oriented_to_individual_not_organisation_13/index.rss</comments>
      <dc:creator>illegale</dc:creator>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;MG wrote:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; More practical to have the party certifed as I see it.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; &amp;gt;Hmnh. There is a fundamental problem between our aproaches. You want to&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; make certificate for an average Joe who is not even interested in&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; politics in this very time and I want to enable those who are&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; politically active right now to empower them with this certification.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; So, as long as we have different focus groups, it seems we will have&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; different products too.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; -Well, there is no need to certify all members expressing their will in&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; an AD-system.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; For delegates or more powerful adminstrators there is indeed.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; But all working inside an AD-organization on a higher level that zero&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; (citizen) should be obliged to follow &lt;span class="caps"&gt;TOP&lt;/span&gt;-principles.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; The only difference I see is that you rely more on todays politicians&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; and organizations and I more on a competing organization, aimed to take&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; ower in the future.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; So, sure, there can be different options in this, too.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Indeed. And it should be, actually. We are far from the moment when we&lt;br /&gt;
sould reach concensus based on experience and wider knowledge.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;Whoever makes it, it will be some good progress from this very moment&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; -Yes!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; Shall we now form a formal, international organization &lt;span class="caps"&gt;TOP&lt;/span&gt;, to which&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; all certified organizations can connect and be connected as long as&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; they fulfill &lt;span class="caps"&gt;TOP&lt;/span&gt; as upheld and defined by this international&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; organzation?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a class="readMore" href="#" onclick="Element.hide(this); Element.removeClassName(this.parentNode.nextSibling, 'tooLarge'); return false;"&gt;Read more&amp;#8230; / Lire plus&amp;#8230;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="tooLarge"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maybe we should reach Stallman to help us out about creating such&lt;br /&gt;
organisation. The problem I see in this very moment (in Tiaktiv) is the&lt;br /&gt;
statute that has too many gaps not to be easily overtaken by the people&lt;br /&gt;
that might be far from &lt;span class="caps"&gt;TOP&lt;/span&gt;. As long as this problem is not solved, I am&lt;br /&gt;
not willing to link organisation directly to any decision we might find&lt;br /&gt;
correct.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Can Tiaktiv be this international org?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We in Tiaktiv are oriented towards creating structure for &lt;span class="caps"&gt;TOP&lt;/span&gt; politics.&lt;br /&gt;
In that manner it might be good think. Yet, Tiaktiv as formal&lt;br /&gt;
organisation is rather weak and I do not trust to its form. So, I hope&lt;br /&gt;
we will get into contact to Stallman (he developed &lt;span class="caps"&gt;GNU&lt;/span&gt; licence) to see&lt;br /&gt;
how could we svolve our issue in the best manner we could.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BTW. In this very time I believe we do not need any organisation for&lt;br /&gt;
development of any &lt;span class="caps"&gt;TOP&lt;/span&gt; definition. For an example, Tiaktiv might&lt;br /&gt;
support one definition AD develops, or vice versa. I believe this way&lt;br /&gt;
might solve the potential problem.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="caps"&gt;ATB&lt;/span&gt;,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Gale&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#8212;~&amp;#8212;~&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;-~&amp;#8212;~&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;~&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;~&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;-~&amp;#8212;~&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;~&lt;br /&gt;
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &amp;#8220;top-politics&amp;#8221; group.&lt;br /&gt;
To post to this group, send email to &lt;a href="mailto:top-politics@googlegroups.com"&gt;top-politics@googlegroups.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to &lt;a href="mailto:top-politics-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com"&gt;top-politics-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
For more options, visit this group at &lt;a href="http://groups.google.com/group/top-politics?hl=en"&gt;http://groups.google.com/group/top-politics?hl=en&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
-~&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;~&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;~&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;~&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;~&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;~&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;~&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;~&amp;#8212;~&amp;#8212;-&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[top-politics] Re: TOP oriented to individual, not organisation</title>
      <pubDate>2006-12-05 23:52:57+0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://leparlement.org/Re_TOP_oriented_to_individual_not_organisation_12/index.rss</link>
      <comments>http://leparlement.org/Re_TOP_oriented_to_individual_not_organisation_12/index.rss</comments>
      <dc:creator>Magnus</dc:creator>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; More practical to have the party certifed as I see it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;Hmnh. There is a fundamental problem between our aproaches. You want to&lt;br /&gt;
make certificate for an average Joe who is not even interested in&lt;br /&gt;
politics in this very time and I want to enable those who are&lt;br /&gt;
politically active right now to empower them with this certification.&lt;br /&gt;
So, as long as we have different focus groups, it seems we will have&lt;br /&gt;
different products too.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Well, there is no need to certify all members expressing their will in&lt;br /&gt;
an AD-system.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
For delegates or more powerful adminstrators there is indeed.&lt;br /&gt;
But all working inside an AD-organization on a higher level that zero&lt;br /&gt;
(citizen) should be obliged to follow &lt;span class="caps"&gt;TOP&lt;/span&gt;-principles.&lt;br /&gt;
The only difference I see is that you rely more on todays politicians&lt;br /&gt;
and organizations and I more on a competing organization, aimed to take&lt;br /&gt;
ower in the future.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
So, sure, there can be different options in this, too.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;Whoever makes it, it will be some good progress from this very moment&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a class="readMore" href="#" onclick="Element.hide(this); Element.removeClassName(this.parentNode.nextSibling, 'tooLarge'); return false;"&gt;Read more&amp;#8230; / Lire plus&amp;#8230;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="tooLarge"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Yes!&lt;br /&gt;
Shall we now form a formal, international organization &lt;span class="caps"&gt;TOP&lt;/span&gt;, to which&lt;br /&gt;
all certified organizations can connect and be connected as long as&lt;br /&gt;
they fulfill &lt;span class="caps"&gt;TOP&lt;/span&gt; as upheld and defined by this international&lt;br /&gt;
organzation? &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Can Tiaktiv be this international org?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#8212;~&amp;#8212;~&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;-~&amp;#8212;~&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;~&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;~&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;-~&amp;#8212;~&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;~&lt;br /&gt;
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &amp;#8220;top-politics&amp;#8221; group.&lt;br /&gt;
To post to this group, send email to &lt;a href="mailto:top-politics@googlegroups.com"&gt;top-politics@googlegroups.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to &lt;a href="mailto:top-politics-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com"&gt;top-politics-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
For more options, visit this group at &lt;a href="http://groups.google.com/group/top-politics?hl=en"&gt;http://groups.google.com/group/top-politics?hl=en&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
-~&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;~&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;~&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;~&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;~&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;~&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;~&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;~&amp;#8212;~&amp;#8212;-&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
