<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>[top-politics] Re: Truth</title>
    <link>http://leparlement.org/Re_Truth_18/vote.rss</link>
    <description>[top-politics] Re: Truth</description>
    <item>
      <title>[top-politics] Re: Truth</title>
      <vote>1</vote>
      <pubDate>2006-09-17 00:54:30+0200</pubDate>
      <link>http://leparlement.org/Re_Truth_19/vote.rss</link>
      <comments>http://leparlement.org/Re_Truth_19/vote.rss</comments>
      <dc:creator>Mark Rosst</dc:creator>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt;L: So? I&amp;#8217;m not sure what it means to be &amp;#8220;Abrahamic.&amp;#8221;
&amp;gt; &amp;gt;
&amp;gt; &amp;gt;-M: Someone who venerates the line of phrophets which extend from
&amp;gt; &amp;gt;Abraham.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;L: &amp;#8220;Venerates?&amp;#8221; That smacks of worship&amp;#8230;. &amp;#8220;Respects&amp;#8221; does not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-M: &amp;#8216;Respect&amp;#8217;, in the context of religious authority, I would call
&amp;#8216;veneration&amp;#8217;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a class="readMore" href="#" onclick="Element.hide(this); Element.removeClassName(this.parentNode.nextSibling, 'tooLarge'); return false;"&gt;Read more&amp;#8230; / Lire plus&amp;#8230;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="tooLarge"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;This includes Jews, Christians, Muslims(and maybe even Bahaii).
&amp;gt; &amp;gt;They largely differ over where this line stops.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;L: Indeed. Christians and Jews-and-Muslims &amp;#8212; the latter being quite
&amp;gt; close &amp;#8212; have differing definitions of prophethood. The Baha&amp;#8217;i
&amp;gt; introduce a whole new concept which is in my opinion alien to Islam,
&amp;gt; but not so alien to Christianity. (The Baha&amp;#8217;i consider the Prophets
&amp;gt; to be the &amp;#8220;Manifestation&amp;#8221; of God, which gets very close to the
&amp;gt; Christian concept of the Incarnation. Jesus himself, of course, was a
&amp;gt; Jew, and quite a good one at that.) But, again, this has to do with &lt;span class="caps"&gt;TOP&lt;/span&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-M: We are nailing down our worldviews &amp;#8211; this enhances communication.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;L: There is a connection, but it is getting pretty thin. The connection
&amp;gt; is my claim that people can come to agreement much more than is often
&amp;gt; thought, if they can take the time and have the space in which to
&amp;gt; examine what they believe deeply, rather than merely noting surface
&amp;gt; appearances and differences.
&amp;gt;
&amp;gt; &amp;gt;-M: Our Shiva is the same as &amp;#8220;God&amp;#8221; and &amp;#8220;Allah&amp;#8221;.
&amp;gt; &amp;gt;I am a monotheist. The other dieties are just personifications of
&amp;gt; &amp;gt;aspects of one Godhead. And your quote there is considered authoritative in my tradition.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;L: It ought to be. That&amp;#8217;s where I got it (or, more accurately, from the
&amp;gt; synthetic Vedanta tradition,&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-M: My tradition is based more on Trika Shaivism than Vedanta, but
there are much more similarities than not. (Laksman Joo cataloged only
five significant differences.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;L: the Sanskrit begins &amp;#8220;ekam sat vipra bahudra vedanti sarvam khalvidam buddham tat tvam asi&amp;#8230;.&amp;#8221; If I remember it correctly.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-M: Fun stuff, eh?  :-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;L: But I could also state it from my personal experience. Truth is one.
&amp;gt; People call it various names. But all agree [where the conditions
&amp;gt; permit it]&amp;#8230;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-M: :-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;shanti&lt;br/&gt;
Mark, Seattle WA &lt;span class="caps"&gt;USA&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
