Identity
Filter
Visitors
(0) (1) (0) (0) (1) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (61) (0) (0) (0)Subscribers
(0) (0)
Highest posts
- 23/01 00:00 +1 Re: How to improve communication on the list?
- 10/05 09:54 +1 Re: How to improve communication on the list?
Latest posts
- 23/01 00:00 +1 Re: How to improve communication on the list?
- 10/05 09:54 +1 Re: How to improve communication on the list?
Links
Blogs
Democracy
Search
[top-politics] Re: How to improve communication on the list?
-
Dear Emmanuel
On Monday 08 May 2006 18:19, echarp wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 03:58:16PM
0000, MG wrote: > > Did you read the AD party programme or my explanations of it? > > I read it but didn’t keep it in mind. Sorry. > > > Organized in a list where the user can sort on age of proposal, > > originator of it, accumulated support (=forecast on when the vote can > > be over), area of interest etc etc. > > Area of interest, hum hum, what is that? How is it associated with > issues? > > All other criteria don’t seem like enough to me. Thousands of issues > would look like a nightmare if sorted only on date, author or support. > > Anyway, organising issues is VERY important, yet we haven’t discussed > it much… :(Why not take a SourceForge approach as disscused earlier. Issues organized in projects or organizations. Each project has his own forum, voting system, wiki etc. where issues can be organized quite well.
Best regards — Markus Schatten, dipl. inf.
e-mail: markus.schatten@foi.hr
http://www.tiaktiv.hr
+1
-
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 07:44:25PM +0200, Markus Schatten wrote:
> Why not take a SourceForge approach as disscused earlier. Issues organized in > projects or organizations. Each project has his own forum, voting system, > wiki etc. where issues can be organized quite well.
I actually have a “book of laws” approach. Where a group of individuals is given a tool used to democratically write those books.
And I would separate the books themselves from their voters, each book elements being approved or not through electoral lists.
Where are managed electoral lists in you opinion? (no one here discusses those lists)
echarp – http://leparlement.org
+1
-
I agree, the “rule of law” is an agreed upon process. We need to have only one topic per initiative. Than each topic is voted upon based on it’s merit.
As we sort through the issues, we will have the most supported at top. Than we can refine and vote again. When a consensus is obtained we could submit to the Simpol project which would than be considered world wide for vote. Bruce
+1
-
-
