<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>[top-politics] Re: How to improve communication on the list?</title>
    <link>http://leparlement.org/aE6f5i33Gr2PFpabcNg4Tc/vote.rss</link>
    <description>[top-politics] Re: How to improve communication on the list?</description>
    <item>
      <title>[top-politics] Re: How to improve communication on the list?</title>
      <vote>1</vote>
      <pubDate>2008-01-23 00:00:27+0100</pubDate>
      <link>http://leparlement.org/Re_How_to_improve_communication_on_the_list/vote.rss</link>
      <comments>http://leparlement.org/Re_How_to_improve_communication_on_the_list/vote.rss</comments>
      <dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree, the &amp;#8220;rule of law&amp;#8221; is an agreed upon process. We need to have only one topic per initiative. Than each topic is voted upon based on it&amp;#8217;s merit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As we sort through the issues, we will have the most supported at top. Than we can refine and vote again. When a consensus is obtained we could submit to the Simpol project which would than be considered world wide for vote.
Bruce&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[top-politics] Re: How to improve communication on the list?</title>
      <vote>1</vote>
      <pubDate>2006-05-10 09:54:15+0200</pubDate>
      <link>http://leparlement.org/bC2i2e3_Wr2QwlabcNg4Tc/vote.rss</link>
      <comments>http://leparlement.org/bC2i2e3_Wr2QwlabcNg4Tc/vote.rss</comments>
      <dc:creator>echarp</dc:creator>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 07:44:25PM +0200, Markus Schatten wrote:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Why not take a SourceForge approach as disscused earlier. Issues organized in 
&amp;gt; projects or organizations. Each project has his own forum, voting system, 
&amp;gt; wiki etc. where issues can be organized quite well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I actually have a &amp;#8220;book of laws&amp;#8221; approach. Where a group of individuals
is given a tool used to democratically write those books.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And I would separate the books themselves from their voters, each book
elements being approved or not through electoral lists.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a class="readMore" href="#" onclick="Element.hide(this); Element.removeClassName(this.parentNode.nextSibling, 'tooLarge'); return false;"&gt;Read more&amp;#8230; / Lire plus&amp;#8230;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div class="tooLarge"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Where are managed electoral lists in you opinion? (no one here discusses
those lists)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;echarp &amp;#8211; &lt;a href="http://leparlement.org"&gt;http://leparlement.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
