http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revanchism
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 02:25:03PM -0000, MG wrote:
> -You describe yourself wrong…
I do apologize if I don’t express myself properly.
> Nationalism is one form of bad populism.
They are linked yes. But I don’t believe that they require criminal leaders to exist.
> Populism is not likely with TOP in place, because nationalism started > by corrupt leaders using the masses for their own goals.
Sorry, this is one easy explanation I’d rather not over use. A nation can be wrong, a democracy can be wrong. I have no problem with that and will not resort to “corrupt leaders” to explain it away.
Hopefully yes, transparency will drastically improve the quality of our democratic decisions, but they nonetheless will be wrong at times!
> Tell me one nationalistic movement without a criminal leader behind. > It’s very big words to say that ALL citzens (or even the majorities of > them) wanted war..
I do believe that most of France wanted WWI, same with Germany and WWII.
By the way, here is a huge political reading: Discourse on Voluntary Servitude
Written by 18 year old “La Boetie” some 5 centuries ago.
echarp – http://leparlement.org
+1
>Hopefully yes, transparency will drastically improve the quality of our democratic decisions, but they nonetheless will be wrong at times!
-Agreed
>I do believe that most of France wanted WWI, same with Germany and WWII.
-If this is a commonly accepted thruth (which I dount) it must be wrong. I don’t know about France but in Germany, WW2, there was a criminal leader involved at least..
+1
MG wrote:
> >Hopefully yes, transparency will drastically improve the quality of our > democratic decisions, but they nonetheless will be wrong at times! > > -Agreed
Somebody said that only in democracies decisions might be wrong.
ATB,
Gale
+1