Identity
Filter
Visitors
(1) (0) (0) (1) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (16) (0) (0) (61) (0) (0) (0)Subscribers
(0) (0)
Highest posts
- 23/05 03:24 +3 Re: An average political forum - top politics
- 29/05 13:17 +1 Re: An average political forum - top politics
- 29/05 13:14 +1 Re: An average political forum - top politics
- 24/05 10:32 +1 Re: An average political forum - top politics
- 22/05 20:59 +1 Re: An average political forum - top politics
Latest posts
- 29/05 13:17 +1 Re: An average political forum - top politics
- 29/05 13:14 +1 Re: An average political forum - top politics
- 24/05 10:32 +1 Re: An average political forum - top politics
- 23/05 03:24 +3 Re: An average political forum - top politics
- 22/05 20:59 +1 Re: An average political forum - top politics
Links
Blogs
Democracy
Search
top-politics
-
21/05/06 17:31
An average political forum - top politics
http://www.politicalcrossfire.com/forum/index.php
It has 9325 registered users
Discussions they have are discussions all of as have majorily overcome a while ago. Any topic we choose from our discussions for promotion if we agree about it would be a great advancment for such a discussion group due to its freshness of aproach, giving a new picture over the whole process.
It would be a great advancment for every single one of us to if some of those people got tired from current political issues that offer no solutions, no new views, no anything, would consider topics we are discuss about fine more interesting than topics they discuss are.
If we try to create such a forum that gathers political advanced concepts and exact organsiations that use them, then we could actually start matter pretty with our work. I do not mind which concrete concepts would profilate up there, as long as I do believe these concepts would be the best for all.
If there was several thousands of people who start aproaching to politics from radically new aproach, understanding it in radically new manner, I suppose we would much sooner gain desired public on our local levels who would create proper partnerhips empowering our work to the level of the not just cultural, but political relevance also.
I remember that Magnus has simmilar ideas in his mind, Markus and I share these ideas. Other members from this would also benefit a lot by such a group as long as they would gain base needed for realisation of their visions. So, I suppose we should try working on this site, getting a chance to prove the qualty of our concepts in real life, not just in debates which is the strongest argument that exists.
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.11.53.63 with SMTP id b63mr102610cwa; Sun, 21 May 2006 08:31:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Token: wIiSmgwAAABsPwFURnf8pNPEMxsIp3gT
Received: from 193.198.138.180 by i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Sun, 21 May 2006 15:31:18 +0000 (UTC) From: “illegale” <geoerdeaen@yahoo.com>
To: “top-politics” <top-politics@googlegroups.com>
Subject: An average political forum – top politics
Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 08:31:18 -0700
Message-ID: <1148225478.225162.152870@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1) Opera 7.23 [en],gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Google-Approved: magnusgus@gmail.com via email at 2006-05-21 19:44:34http://www.politicalcrossfire.com/forum/index.php
It has 9325 registered users
Discussions they have are discussions all of as have majorily overcome a while ago. Any topic we choose from our discussions for promotion if we agree about it would be a great advancment for such a discussion group due to its freshness of aproach, giving a new picture over the whole process.
It would be a great advancment for every single one of us to if some of those people got tired from current political issues that offer no solutions, no new views, no anything, would consider topics we are discuss about fine more interesting than topics they discuss are.
If we try to create such a forum that gathers political advanced concepts and exact organsiations that use them, then we could actually start matter pretty with our work. I do not mind which concrete concepts would profilate up there, as long as I do believe these concepts would be the best for all.
If there was several thousands of people who start aproaching to politics from radically new aproach, understanding it in radically new manner, I suppose we would much sooner gain desired public on our local levels who would create proper partnerhips empowering our work to the level of the not just cultural, but political relevance also.
I remember that Magnus has simmilar ideas in his mind, Markus and I share these ideas. Other members from this would also benefit a lot by such a group as long as they would gain base needed for realisation of their visions. So, I suppose we should try working on this site, getting a chance to prove the qualty of our concepts in real life, not just in debates which is the strongest argument that exists.
+2
-
+1 ;-)
So you did you have in mind to turn this site to our playground to try out some of the concepts discussed here? Would be good to create a wiki to organize top (only for reference – so people could see what we are working on). I think Guy invited us to opolitics (we could easily bind a wiki to that domain and see what happends). What do the others think?
Best regards
MS
+3
-
mschatte@foi.hr wrote:
+1 ;-)
So you did you have in mind to turn this site to our playground to try out some of the concepts discussed here? Would be good to create a wiki to organize top (only for reference – so people could see what we are working on). I think Guy invited us to opolitics (we could easily bind a wiki to that domain and see what happends). What do the others think?
+1 ATB,
GalePS. One little notice. If you want other to give proper respond, I suppose this aproach is not enough as long as people usually do not read all the subjects and what is maybe more important, this sort of question they might not take as decision making importanc, but mere off topic.
Best regards
MS
+1
-
+1
First, it is interesting to read in forums like this with so many debaters.
Secondly, we can advocate our visions there
Third, some hopefully will support us or come to us. Fourth, The donated opoplitcs will be a great platform from where we can create something at least as good as politicalcrossfire but without the bindings to the traditional thinkning with almost everything related to the politicians of today instead of some promising visions.
A wiki is great to have beside/together with the blog.
+1
-
-
Now we are talking!
I didn’t knew of this site.
Nice to see they’re using PHPbb…
We should be seen on all major forums about politics. I have tried this in Sweden for AD and I think it is the only way to get known before we have some real power somewhere. I’ll start now to read all posts here…:
http://www.politicalcrossfire.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=55567&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=direct+democracy&start=0BR/
MagnusX-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.11.88.14 with SMTP id l14mr43890cwb; Mon, 22 May 2006 11:59:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Token: pKDkOwwAAADAMczX1kTqn8z_ckBzrmPi
Received: from 212.105.24.226 by i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Mon, 22 May 2006 18:59:00 +0000 (UTC) From: “MG” <magnusgus@gmail.com>
To: “top-politics” <top-politics@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: An average political forum – top politics Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 18:59:00 -0000
Message-ID: <1148324340.607022.152280@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <1148225478.225162.152870@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> References: <1148225478.225162.152870@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plainNow we are talking!
I didn’t knew of this site.
Nice to see they’re using PHPbb…
We should be seen on all major forums about politics. I have tried this in Sweden for AD and I think it is the only way to get known before we have some real power somewhere. I’ll start now to read all posts here…:
http://www.politicalcrossfire.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=55567&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=direct+democracy&start=0BR/
Magnus
+1
-
MG wrote:
Now we are talking! I didn’t knew of this site. Nice to see they’re using PHPbb… We should be seen on all major forums about politics.
I agree. But before that, as Emmanuel and Pether noticed, I suppose we should have some short info about each initiative, about common interests, about things we do not agree and so on in a manner of easy reprensetation of work of this group.
I know you have already a lot of info in English about AD, but I do not consider it being a proper thing as long as people do not read more then 10 lines if these lines do not get them keen about the rest of the text. I am looking for these 10 lines about each one of us, 10 lines that would make people interested before ther vanish.
What do you think about this?
I have tried this in Sweden for AD and I think it is the only way to get known before we have some real power somewhere.
This is our birth ground, we should use it absolutely. ATB;
GaleI’ll start now to read all posts here…: http://www.politicalcrossfire.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=55567&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=direct+democracy&start=0 BR/ Magnus
+1
-
-
