top-politics

• 03/07/06 19:11 <illegale>

  [top-politics] About TOP

  Hello.

  I decided to translate part of document in Croatian that talks about TOP, as long as it is in focus of our current action. I suppose Markus should post definition of TOP also to this group and we should look for definitions on open-organisaions.org and simmilar stuff to get as good grounds as we can in this moment for further discussions.

  So, here is the first part:

  About TOP

  The idea of completely TOP (transparent, open, pubilc) political interface where all participants have the direct aproach to all informations relevant for their making of their political decisions ( it was not possible before ), interface that thanks to archieving of all information enables backrouting for any wrong decision and articualtes direct responsibility for political action. Full transaprency and opennes of the political process means new basic political paramethers, new paradigm of politics, we call TOP politics.

  Now, I am going to elaborate on the meaning of these new principles.

  Full transparency

  Full transparency means transparent process of decision making based on publicly reachable information. Every political body needs to have clear mechanism of desicion making, that makes easy to articulate exact responsibilty of every single participant. Every political move, using TOP politics gets archived, so good or bad moves become permanently reachable to the public.

  This benchmark means that every single deed, including good ones become permanent capital in someones political reputation. In the same time every single wrong deed becomes permanent blur, so participants of the top politics need to be much more carefull about doing actions that might be wrong. The whole thing enables long term reputation building, where full transparency enables full blessing of such investment.

  To make comparison, todays political process can not enable profit based on good deeds, as long as the lack of transparency does not enable it. In the non transparent process that is going on the level of the World, oportunistic moves are the ones that profilate political elite. Wrong decisions or any other political deeds of individal participants due to curtain of non transparency do not attach proportional public support. Sadly, the same thing happens to good deeds, which makes them be non popular for the ambitious ones.

  The whole process of today becomes «loan shark» oriented, as long as there is no mechanism that would protect long term investemnts, aka good.

  ---

  There is the part about opennes, yet i do not find it fine enough to post it right now, so i will make some adjustments first.

  ATB,
  Gale

  -~-~————-~—~——~——————~———-~—~——~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “top-politics” group. To post to this group, send email to top-politics@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to top-politics-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/top-politics ~————-~——~——~——~———~——~———~—~—-

  +3 New discussion Answer
  • 04/07/06 10:22 <echarp> +1 -1
  • 04/07/06 09:39 <Magnus>

    +1 !

    -~-~————-~—~——~——————~———-~—~——~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “top-politics” group. To post to this group, send email to top-politics@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to top-politics-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/top-politics ~————-~——~——~——~———~——~———~—~—-

    +1 New discussion Answer

v0.17