Gordan Ponjavic wrote:
I assume your software is developed for large organizations withhundreds of members. I assume your software is developed for bottom-up,grassroots principle where elected leaders are direct product of ad hocgroup decision which is possible thanks to internet.
It’s developed almost purely as a propaganda project with the main objective to increase political awareness and increase survelliance of existing politicians.
OK. There is probably too many assumptions, that are even not importantones. What I find important is: Is your party based on rigid, hard todiminish hierarchies or on fluid ones where no one can be to certain?If your organization is based on fluid hierarchies, how do you enablemass communication of hundreds of members without having too muchnon-appropriate material which is regular when you deal with hundreds?
I currently don’t have any issues like the ones you describe above, normally I prefer to solve problems when I actually got them. But would be interesting to know how filters would solve this problem ?
I understand that I have no clue what exact political model you had inmind when you started developing this software, so maybe, if thesequestions are too abstract, we could start in that way?
A paradigm shift to some sort of direct democracy, and I belive that a portal for political parties that can lets them make decisions online can result in many different poltical models.
Kind regards
Pether
-~-~————-~—~——~——————~———-~—~——~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “top-politics” group.
To post to this group, send email to top-politics@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to top-politics-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/top-politics?hl=en
~————-~——~——~——~———~——~———~—~—-
+1
New discussion
Answer